Login (DCU Staff Only)
Login (DCU Staff Only)

DORAS | DCU Research Repository

Explore open access research and scholarly works from DCU

Advanced Search

A comparative study of post-editing guidelines

Hu, Ke and Cadwell, Patrick orcid logoORCID: 0000-0002-2371-4378 (2016) A comparative study of post-editing guidelines. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4 (2). pp. 346-353. ISSN 2255-8942

Abstract
With the popular use of machine translation technology in the translation industry, postediting has been widely adopted with the aim of improving target text quality. Every post-editing project needs to have specific guidelines for translators to comply with, since the guidelines may help clients and LSPs to set clear expectations, and save time and effort for translators. Different organizations make their own rules according to their needs. In this paper, we focus on comparing five sources of post-editing guidelines, and point out their overlaps and differences.
Metadata
Item Type:Article (Published)
Refereed:Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords:translation; light post-editing; full post-editing; post-editing guidelines
Subjects:Computer Science > Machine translating
DCU Faculties and Centres:DCU Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Science > School of Applied Language and Intercultural Studies
Research Initiatives and Centres > ADAPT
Publisher:Vilnius University, University of Latvia, Latvia University of Agriculture, Institute of Mathematics and Informatics of University of Latvia
Official URL:https://www.bjmc.lu.lv/fileadmin/user_upload/lu_po...
Copyright Information:© 2016 BJMT (Open)
Use License:This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. View License
Funders:Science Foundation of Ireland (SFI) ADAPT project (Grant No.: P31021)
ID Code:23260
Deposited On:09 May 2019 09:10 by Thomas Murtagh . Last Modified 09 May 2019 09:10
Documents

Full text available as:

[thumbnail of A_Comparative_Study_of_Post-editing_Guidelines[1].pdf]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
330kB
Downloads

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Archive Staff Only: edit this record